Now that the Cardinals have locked up receiver Larry Fitzgerald at a more affordable (or, as the case may be, less unaffordable) price over the next four seasons, they might have to deal with another thorny issue at the position.
According to Adam Schefter of NFL Network, Anquan Boldin could want more money and/or a trade in the wake of Fitzgerald’s $10 million-per-year contract.
Per Schefter, some in the Cardinals organization actually regard Boldin as the better wideout. But Boldin will make far, far less than Fitzgerald over the next three seasons — he’s due to earn base salaries of $2.5 million, $2.75 million, $3 million in 2008, 2009, and 2010, respectively.
In our view, Fitzgerald and Boldin together is a luxury that the Cardinals don’t need, especially with coach Ken Whisenhunt presumably trying to bring a Pittsburgh-style power running vibe to the desert.
Assuming that the Cardinals have a plan (which could be a dangerous assumption because we’re talking about, you know, the Cardinals), the huge deal given to Fitzgerald should be regarded as evidence that they’ve opted to keep Fitzgerald over the long haul, and to get what they can for Boldin.
Throw in the fact that Boldin is represented by Drew Rosenhaus, and the stage is set for Boldin to start making noise about moving on.
Possible destinations are Philly, Dallas, and the Redskins.
_2.gif&contenttype=gif)





March 11th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
That’s interesting, and could very well happen. I’d be more inclined to believe it if they made an attempt to keep Bryant Johnson, but then again he is still a free agent. If Johnson signs elsewhere, I can’t imagine Boldin is leaving this year, as Fitzgerald will see way too many double teams without another guy who can actually catch.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 11th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
The Cards have had these two wide-outs for a few years now, and the team hasn’t done anything great with them. Two top notch WR’s is a luxury a team that rarely makes the playoffs can afford. They would be better off keeping one of them(at this point probably Fitzgerald) and trading the other one to a team like the Eagles who are desperate for a big time wide-out. Boldin’s contract is probably a lot easier to move too.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 11th, 2008 at 11:57 pm
[…] destinations are Philly, Dallas, and the Redskins. This is what Eknox is referring to… ProFootballTalk.com __________________ What’s with the Giants’ linemen? One’s biting the balls off of sheep and the […]
(report as inappropriate)
March 12th, 2008 at 12:22 am
[…] PFT.com: Now that the Cardinals have locked up receiver Larry Fitzgerald at a more affordable (or, as the […]
(report as inappropriate)
March 12th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
1) Johnson signed with the Bills, so that’s easy enough to answer Colinito
2) Fitz is actually more or less impossible to move as he re-did his contract
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated
March 12th, 2008 at 4:23 pm
Johnson did not sign with Bills he just came in for a visit. The Bills need to resign Evans first to a long term deal. Then Try to get a number 2.
(report as inappropriate)
Rating: Not yet rated